Would you consider someone insane if the reality he/she believes is different from yours or different from the rest of the group? In terms of reality and absurdity of thought, what is "normal" anyway? Is being "normal" equalize to a crowd who believes at the same reality?
Between the two subjects where one is tagged "insane" and the other one is "normal"; considering that there's one noted coexisting reality among thousands of possibilities, would that one similar belief make the insane "normal"? Or would that make the normal considered "insane"?
How would you define sanity then if the point of basis is questionable? How would you determine the fine line separating the sane thinking and insanity of thoughts?
Familiar with Gregory House (House M.D.)? You noticed how absurd he is sometimes yet still manages to make a difference between life and death? Why do his fellow look at his absurdity on the output of his insane thoughts?
You do know Albert Einstein, right? If you lived at his time, would you join the bandwagon and consider him crazy on the way he looks and the theories he presented? And would you regret judging him such, now that he's considered a rocket scientist?
Have you noticed how every sentences in this post ended with a question mark? That I've been asking questions from the start up until to this point? Have you noticed that you really haven't got anything upon reading this post and you just wasted your time reading it?
LOL.
(Thank God it's already September. So many things happened in August, it almost drove me insane.)Labels: reactions, realization